Beanland v. Sweitzer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Beanland v. Sweitzer

314 N.E.2d 736, 21 Ill. App. 3d 121

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 23, 1974

DocketNo. 73-343

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 314 N.E.2d 736 (Beanland v. Sweitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beanland v. Sweitzer, 314 N.E.2d 736, 21 Ill. App. 3d 121 (Ill. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $2537. Defendants have appealed seeking reversal and remandment for a new trial.

Plaintiffs-appellees have moved to affirm the judgment, on the grounds that the defendants did not file a post-Mai motion, and therefore failed to preserve a basis for review by this court.

We believe plaintiffs-appellees’ interpretation of section 68.1 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 68.1) is correct. Roberson v. Leak, 72 Ill.App.2d 11, 218 N.E.2d 819; Farnsworth v. Shops Budding, 77 Ill.App.2d 44, 222 N.E.2d 132.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI