Beane v. Bisson

551 A.2d 1386, 1989 Me. LEXIS 5
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 11, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 551 A.2d 1386 (Beane v. Bisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beane v. Bisson, 551 A.2d 1386, 1989 Me. LEXIS 5 (Me. 1989).

Opinion

HORNBY, Justice.

[1387]*1387We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County; Alexander, J.) affirming the judgment of the District Court (Lewiston; Scales, J.). In denying a motion to change the custody provision of a 1979 divorce decree, the District Court did not misapply 19 M.R.S.A. § 752 (Supp.1988), nor did it abuse its discretion in evaluating the effect of changes in the mother’s circumstances upon the children’s interests. See Ziehm v. Ziehm, 433 A.2d 725, 730 (Me.1981), Villa v. Smith, 534 A.2d 1310, 1312 (Me.1987). The Court also properly denied a motion to hold the father in contempt. Though the father may have been in violation of a mediated agreement, that agreement never became a court order, 19 M.R.S.A. § 752(4), and therefore could not be the basis for a contempt finding.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cloutier v. Cloutier
2003 ME 4 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 A.2d 1386, 1989 Me. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beane-v-bisson-me-1989.