Bean v. Wells

28 Barb. 466, 1858 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 159
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 4, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 Barb. 466 (Bean v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bean v. Wells, 28 Barb. 466, 1858 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 159 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1858).

Opinion

By the Court, Sutherland, J.

The defendant Wells in this action was not served with the summons. There is a good cause of action stated in the complaint, against the defendant' Eenway, to which he appeared and answered, and the issue was referred to A. K. Hadley, Esq. who reported in favor of the plaintiff. The report of the referee, and the judgment entered thereon, were abundantly justified by the law and the evidence.

The evidence in the case, to which no objection was made, appears to us to have been amply sufficient to authorize the conclusion to which the referee arrived; and we are at a loss to see upon what ground the defendant Eenway expected us to set aside the report of the referee and reverse the judgment.

The judgment entered on the report of the referee must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Habeeb v. Daas
14 Misc. 437 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
Viele v. Goss.
49 Barb. 96 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Barb. 466, 1858 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bean-v-wells-nysupct-1858.