Bean v. United States Department of Justice
This text of 139 F. App'x 586 (Bean v. United States Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie Karl Bean appeals the district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bean v. United, States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-05-253-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2005). We deny Bean’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
[587]*587 AFFIRMED
Jurisdiction was proper in the District Court for the District of Columbia where this case was originally filed. However, because the district court's disposition of the case is correct regardless of which district court were to review this case, there is no need to transfer the case back to the District Court for the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bean-v-united-states-department-of-justice-ca4-2005.