Bean v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Bean v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

185 F. App'x 259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 14, 2006

DocketNo. 05-2042

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 F. App'x 259 (Bean v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bean v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 185 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary D. Bean appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his employment discrimination action against United Parcel Service, Incorporated. Finding no error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gary D. Bean appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his employment discrimination action against United Parcel Service, Incorporated. Finding no error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bean-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca4-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack