Bean v. Staples

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Bean v. Staples

74 A. 542, 75 N.H. 597, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 80

DecidedNovember 2, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A. 542 (Bean v. Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bean v. Staples, 74 A. 542, 75 N.H. 597, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 80 (N.H. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition, for a construction of the following clause of the will of Ellen S. Clark: “ To Kenrick C. Bean, son of said Mary I. Bean, and to Jeremiah E. Franklin, son of said Anna D. Franklin, provided he reach the age of twenty-one years, I give to each the sum of one thousand dollars.” At the October term, 1908, of the superior court it was held by Stone, J., that Kenrick’s legacy vested on Mrs. Clark’s death, and the defendant excepted. Upon consideration of the case in the supreme court the order was,

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition, for a construction of the following clause of the will of Ellen S. Clark: “ To Kenrick C. Bean, son of said Mary I. Bean, and to Jeremiah E. Franklin, son of said Anna D. Franklin, provided he reach the age of twenty-one years, I give to each the sum of one thousand dollars.” At the October term, 1908, of the superior court it was held by Stone, J., that Kenrick’s legacy vested on Mrs. Clark’s death, and the defendant excepted. Upon consideration of the case in the supreme court the order was,

Exception overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A. 542, 75 N.H. 597, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bean-v-staples-nh-1909.