Bean v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bean v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

265 S.W.3d 892, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1368, 2008 WL 4515366

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 7, 2008

DocketED 90473

StatusPublished

This text of 265 S.W.3d 892 (Bean v. Johnson Controls, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bean v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 265 S.W.3d 892, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1368, 2008 WL 4515366 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.C. Penney Corp., Inc. (J.C. Penney) appeals from an order and judgment of the St. Louis County circuit court dated January 22, 2008, which denied J.C. Penney’s motion to intervene and motion to set aside order of apportionment.

J.C. Penney raises two points on appeal. First, it argues that it established the requirements for intervention as a matter of right under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 52.12(a)(2). Second, J.C. Penney argues that the apportionment of the settlement was fraudulent because its sole purpose was to defeat J.C. Penney’s workers’ compensation lien.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI