Bean v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms

322 F.3d 829, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2966, 2003 WL 356282
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2003·No. 00-40304·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 1

PER CURIAM:

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the United States Supreme Court by an Opinion entered December 10, 2002, in — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 584, 154 L.Ed.2d 483, held that the federal district court did not have authority under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) to grant any relief in favor of Respondent, Bean; and therefore reversed the decision of this Court which had affirmed the action of the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the prior decision of this Court (253 F.3d 234) and remand this appeal to the district court for entry of an order dismissing Bean’s claims for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bean v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, 322 F.3d 829, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2966, 2003 WL 356282 (5th Cir. 2003).

322 F.3d 829 (Bean v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bean
537 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Bean v. Bureau of Alcohol
253 F.3d 234 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)