Bean v. Bean

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bean v. Bean

515 S.W.2d 788, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 6, 1974

DocketNos. 35347 and 35608

StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.W.2d 788 (Bean v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bean v. Bean, 515 S.W.2d 788, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals are from judgments of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the first denying appellant’s motion for reduction of his alimony payments to respondent previously ordered in a divorce case and an order granting respondent’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees on appeal. § 452.070 RSMo. 1969, V. A.M.S. (repealed effective January 1, 1974, by Laws 1973, p. -, H.B.No.315 Sec. A, —[Vernon’s Missouri Legislative Service, 1973, No. 2, 77th General Assembly, First Regular Session 1973, Page 412 et seq.]— but in effect at the time the judgments were entered).

The judgments of the trial court are based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and we have determined that an opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

The judgments are affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals are from judgments of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the first denying appellant’s motion for reduction of his alimony payments to respondent previously ordered in a divorce case and an order granting respondent’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees on appeal. § 452.070 RSMo. 1969, V. A.M.S. (repealed effective January 1, 1974, by Laws 1973, p. -, H.B.No.315 Sec. A, —[Vernon’s Missouri Legislative Service, 1973, No. 2, 77th General Assembly, First Regular Session 1973, Page 412 et seq.]— but in effect at the time the judgments were entered).

The judgments of the trial court are based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and we have determined that an opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

The judgments are affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 S.W.2d 788, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bean-v-bean-moctapp-1974.