Beamont's Case

1 N.C. 708
Court of King's Bench·Decided July 5, 1793·Published

Opinion

If the judgments were had by covin, he may traverse generally; but perhaps they were rightly obtained, and afterwards an agreement made to pay so much per month in satisfaction, etc.; in the meantime the judgments were kept on foot. In this case the keeping the judgments on foot is traversable, and the payment is only an inducement, and a matter of inducement is not traversable. Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff. Jones, 171; Bendl., 166.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beamont's Case, 1 N.C. 708 (kingsbench 1793).

1 N.C. 708 (Beamont's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.