Beamont's Case

Court of King's Bench

Beamont's Case

1 N.C. 708

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 708 (Beamont's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beamont's Case, 1 N.C. 708 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

If the judgments were had by covin, he may traverse generally; but perhaps they were rightly obtained, and afterwards an agreement made to pay so much per month in satisfaction, etc.; in the meantime the judgments were kept on foot. In this case the keeping the judgments on foot is traversable, and the payment is only an inducement, and a matter of inducement is not traversable. Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff. Jones, 171; Bendl., 166.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

If the judgments were had by covin, he may traverse generally; but perhaps they were rightly obtained, and afterwards an agreement made to pay so much per month in satisfaction, etc.; in the meantime the judgments were kept on foot. In this case the keeping the judgments on foot is traversable, and the payment is only an inducement, and a matter of inducement is not traversable. Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff. Jones, 171; Bendl., 166.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beamonts-case-kingsbench-1793.