Beamont's case

Circuit Court of North Carolina

Beamont's case

1 N.C. 111

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 111 (Beamont's case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beamont's case, 1 N.C. 111 (circtnc 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

Doderidge, J.

If the judgments were had by covin, he may traverse generally; but perhaps they were rightly obtained, and afterwards an agreement made to pay to much per month in satisfaction, &c. in the mean time the judgments were kept on foot. In this case the keeping the judgments on foot is traversable, and the payment is only an inducement, and a matter of inducement is not traversable. Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff. Jones 171. Bendl. 166.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doderidge, J.

If the judgments were had by covin, he may traverse generally; but perhaps they were rightly obtained, and afterwards an agreement made to pay to much per month in satisfaction, &c. in the mean time the judgments were kept on foot. In this case the keeping the judgments on foot is traversable, and the payment is only an inducement, and a matter of inducement is not traversable. Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff. Jones 171. Bendl. 166.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beamonts-case-circtnc-1793.