Beament v. Furniss

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Beament v. Furniss

110 N.Y.S. 202

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 202 (Beament v. Furniss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beament v. Furniss, 110 N.Y.S. 202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

The action is to recover the sum of $130.50, a part of which is for cash loaned to the defendant’s wife and the. rest for board and lodging furnished to her. The defendant and'his wife during the period covered by the transactions in suit were living apart; she having left him some time previously. Upon the trial it was conceded that the board and lodging and the moneys loaned were all to be deemed necessaries; the only question to the court being whether the defendant would be liable for them as necessaries. Judgment for the full amount in favor of the plaintiff was rendered by the justice after hearing the testimony. In the brief submitted by the appellant’s counsel it is conceded that the only question on this appeal is one of- fact—whether the defendant’s wife left him- wrong[203]*203fully or not. Upon this issue there was a sharp conflict of testimony, her word against his, and there is no reason why her testimony should not be accepted as establishing the plaintiff’s case.

. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIEGERICH, J.

The action is to recover the sum of $130.50, a part of which is for cash loaned to the defendant’s wife and the. rest for board and lodging furnished to her. The defendant and'his wife during the period covered by the transactions in suit were living apart; she having left him some time previously. Upon the trial it was conceded that the board and lodging and the moneys loaned were all to be deemed necessaries; the only question to the court being whether the defendant would be liable for them as necessaries. Judgment for the full amount in favor of the plaintiff was rendered by the justice after hearing the testimony. In the brief submitted by the appellant’s counsel it is conceded that the only question on this appeal is one of- fact—whether the defendant’s wife left him- wrong[203]*203fully or not. Upon this issue there was a sharp conflict of testimony, her word against his, and there is no reason why her testimony should not be accepted as establishing the plaintiff’s case.

. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.Y.S. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beament-v-furniss-nyappterm-1908.