Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

132 A. 921, 99 N.J. Eq. 427, 14 Stock. 427, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 543
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 1, 1926·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the vice-chancellor. We, however, express no opinion upon the meritorious questions argued, for the reason that they are involved in the appeal now pending in the prerogative court. Should that appeal be adversely decided to the appellants here, an appeal is open to this court for the purpose of review upon the question indicated.

*428 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 132 A. 921, 99 N.J. Eq. 427, 14 Stock. 427, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 543 (N.J. 1926).

132 A. 921 (Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
39 A.2d 120 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Van Buren v. Plainfield Trust Co.
22 A.2d 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
Melosh v. Melosh
6 A.2d 472 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarter
162 A. 274 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)