Beals v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beals v. County of Nassau

118 A.D.2d 529, 499 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 118 A.D.2d 529 (Beals v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beals v. County of Nassau, 118 A.D.2d 529, 499 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated October 10, 1984, which denied her motion for leave to serve amended answers to certain interrogatories demanded by the defendants, with leave to renew upon the submission of proper papers.

[530]*530Order affirmed, with costs.

While a plaintiff who avers a lack of personal knowledge of the defendant’s alleged departure from good and accepted medical practice may be permitted to supplement his or her responses to interrogatories if and when additional information is procured (see, Higdon v County of Nassau, 98 AD2d 762), Special Term herein chose to deny the plaintiff’s motion with leave to renew upon the submission of proper papers. In so doing, Special Term acted within its discretion. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated October 10, 1984, which denied her motion for leave to serve amended answers to certain interrogatories demanded by the defendants, with leave to renew upon the submission of proper papers.

[530]*530Order affirmed, with costs.

While a plaintiff who avers a lack of personal knowledge of the defendant’s alleged departure from good and accepted medical practice may be permitted to supplement his or her responses to interrogatories if and when additional information is procured (see, Higdon v County of Nassau, 98 AD2d 762), Special Term herein chose to deny the plaintiff’s motion with leave to renew upon the submission of proper papers. In so doing, Special Term acted within its discretion. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 529, 499 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beals-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack