Beals, Torrey & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

74 N.W. 54, 53 Neb. 601, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 463
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 1898
DocketNo. 7706
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 74 N.W. 54 (Beals, Torrey & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beals, Torrey & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 74 N.W. 54, 53 Neb. 601, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 463 (Neb. 1898).

Opinion

Norval, J.

This action was for the recovery of damages sustained by the plaintiff for the failure of the defendant to correctly transmit and deliver a message. Before the final submission of the cause plaintiff asked leave to withdraw a juror, which motion was denied by the court, as was likewise overruled the application of plaintiff for leave to dismiss the cause without prejudice to a future action. A verdict, under a peremptory instruction of the court, was returned for the defendant, and the judgment entered thereon is before us for review.

It appears from the record that before the final submission of the cause to the jury plaintiff asked permission to dismiss the action without prejudice, which application the court denied. This ruling was clearly erroneous. By section 430 of the Code of Civil Procedure the right is given a plaintiff to dismiss his action without prejudice to a future suit at any time prior to final submission, upon such equitable terms as the court may impose. (Sheedy v. McMurtry, 44 Neb. 499; Dayton & W. R. Co. v. Marshall, 11 O. St. 502; Hancock Ditch Co. v. Bradford, 13 Cal. 637.) There was an abuse of discretion under the circumstances in refusing to allow plaintiff to discontinue his action. The judgment is accordingly reversed, with directions to the court below to enter an order of dismissal without prejudice to the right of plaintiff to institute another action for the same cause.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schaaf v. Schaaf
978 N.W.2d 1 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
Dawson v. Papio Natural Resources District
313 N.W.2d 242 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
Duffy v. Cody
262 N.W. 828 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1935)
Plattsmouth Loan & Building Ass'n v. Sedlak
259 N.W. 367 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1935)
First Trust Co. of Omaha v. Allen
60 F.2d 812 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)
Blue River Power Co. v. Hronik
217 N.W. 604 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1928)
Van Sant v. Wentworth
108 N.E. 975 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Snyder v. Collier
123 N.W. 1023 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)
Yates v. Jones National Bank
105 N.W. 287 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)
Gassman v. Jarvis
94 F. 603 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 N.W. 54, 53 Neb. 601, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beals-torrey-co-v-western-union-telegraph-co-neb-1898.