Beall v. Dick

2 F. Cas. 1118, 4 Cranch 18, 4 D.C. 18
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge,

not sitting in this cause) was of opinion that the exemplification of the record of the mortgage was sufficient evidence of the existence of the mortgage and of the debt; and also permitted the affidavit of one of the plaintiffs to be read, as to the loss of the original deed. CRANCH, Chief Judge, however, [1119] very much doubting as to tbe propriety of admitting the affidavit, as the court was of opinion that it was not incumbent upon the plaintiffs to produce, or to show the loss of, the original mortgage. See Laws Md. 1785. c. 9, § 7, “or a full copy of the same from the record.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beall v. Dick, 2 F. Cas. 1118, 4 Cranch 18, 4 D.C. 18 (circtddc 1830).

2 F. Cas. 1118 (Beall v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson Railroad
18 Wend. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)