Beall v. Dick

2 F. Cas. 1118, 4 Cranch 18, 4 D.C. 18
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMay 15, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 F. Cas. 1118 (Beall v. Dick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beall v. Dick, 2 F. Cas. 1118, 4 Cranch 18, 4 D.C. 18 (circtddc 1830).

Opinion

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge,

not sitting in this cause) was of opinion that the exemplification of the record of the mortgage was sufficient evidence of the existence of the mortgage and of the debt; and also permitted the affidavit of one of the plaintiffs to be read, as to the loss of the original deed. CRANCH, Chief Judge, however, [1119]*1119very much doubting as to tbe propriety of admitting the affidavit, as the court was of opinion that it was not incumbent upon the plaintiffs to produce, or to show the loss of, the original mortgage. See Laws Md. 1785. c. 9, § 7, “or a full copy of the same from the record.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson Railroad
18 Wend. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 1118, 4 Cranch 18, 4 D.C. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beall-v-dick-circtddc-1830.