Beall v. Bailey

45 Ga. 300
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 45 Ga. 300 (Beall v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beall v. Bailey, 45 Ga. 300 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

The Revised Code, section 3613, is positive and precise that the officer shall return the affidavit and bond to the next term of the Court from which the execution issued, and it shall be the duty of the Court, at the first term thereof, to determine the same. The plaintiff in this case is well satisfied that the affidavit is very lame and was only interposed for delay. Suppose it is. That does not make it returnable to a different term. It is important that the rule be kept uni[301]*301form. The return of the papers is the only notice either gets of the pendancy of the illegality, and it is important, both to the plaintiff and defendant, that each party shall know when the case is to be heard. The case of Brown & Wright vs. Smith & Leonard, 24 Georgia Reports, 418, is precisely in point. There the certiorari was frivolous. But this Court overruled the Judge in taking it up at a term too soon. The statute is positive and must be obeyed. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLendon v. Lemon
54 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Adamson v. Gaultney
41 S.E.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Brown v. Seals
86 S.E. 277 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Ga. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beall-v-bailey-ga-1872.