Beale's Executors v. Commonwealth ex rel. Smedly
This text of 11 Serg. & Rawle 305 (Beale's Executors v. Commonwealth ex rel. Smedly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is the same in principle, as the preceding case, with the additional circumstance, that the deputation was produced, but the subscribing witness did not attend, to prove the execution of the instrument; and evidence was admitted of M‘Clure’s acting as deputy of the coroner in other instances; and this held to be proof of a general deputation. For the reasons assigned in the former case, I am of opinion this judgment should be reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.
Judgment reversed', and a venire facias de novo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Serg. & Rawle 305, 1824 Pa. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beales-executors-v-commonwealth-ex-rel-smedly-pa-1824.