Beale v. Jones

Idaho Supreme Court

Beale v. Jones

207 P. 728, 35 Idaho 548, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 81

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided June 1, 1922·Published

Opinion

BUDGE, J.

The questions involved in these cases are substantially the same as those determined in the. case of Abrams v. Jones, ante, p. 532, 207 Pac. 724, and upon the authority of that case the judgments in these cases are affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Dunn, J., concur. Lee, J., concurs in the conclusion reached. McCarthy, J., being disqualified, did not sit at the hearing nor take part in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDGE, J.

The questions involved in these cases are substantially the same as those determined in the. case of Abrams v. Jones, ante, p. 532, 207 Pac. 724, and upon the authority of that case the judgments in these cases are affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Dunn, J., concur. Lee, J., concurs in the conclusion reached. McCarthy, J., being disqualified, did not sit at the hearing nor take part in the opinion.

Beale v. Jones, 207 P. 728, 35 Idaho 548, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 81 (Idaho 1922).

Pincite

207 P. 728 (Beale v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related