Beale v. Hirsch Lumber Co.
89 S.E. 347, 18 Ga. App. 258, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 265
This text of 89 S.E. 347 (Beale v. Hirsch Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beale v. Hirsch Lumber Co., 89 S.E. 347, 18 Ga. App. 258, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
There is no substantial merit in either of the two special grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial; the evidence sufficiently supported the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 347, 18 Ga. App. 258, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beale-v-hirsch-lumber-co-gactapp-1916.