Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.

277 A.D.2d 336, 716 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 360

Opinion

—In a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a deficiency judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered August 19, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court dated April 5, 1999, inter alia, granting that branch of its motion which was for leave to enter a deficiency judgment, is in the principal sum of only $275,160.61.

Ordered that the deficiency judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The court’s determination that the fair and reasonable market value of the mortgaged premises as of the date of the foreclosure sale was $1,800,000 is supported by the evidence (see, RPAPL 1371 [2]; see also, Farmers Natl. Bank v Tulloch, 55 AD2d 773).

[337]*337The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit (see, Plaza Hotel Assocs. v Wellington Assocs., 37 NY2d 273; Farmers Natl. Bank v Tulloch, supra). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp., 277 A.D.2d 336, 716 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 336 (Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plaza Hotel Associates v. Wellington Associates, Inc.
333 N.E.2d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Farmers National Bank of Malone v. Tulloch
55 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)