Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.
This text of 277 A.D.2d 336 (Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a deficiency judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered August 19, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court dated April 5, 1999, inter alia, granting that branch of its motion which was for leave to enter a deficiency judgment, is in the principal sum of only $275,160.61.
Ordered that the deficiency judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The court’s determination that the fair and reasonable market value of the mortgaged premises as of the date of the foreclosure sale was $1,800,000 is supported by the evidence (see, RPAPL 1371 [2]; see also, Farmers Natl. Bank v Tulloch, 55 AD2d 773).
[337]*337The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit (see, Plaza Hotel Assocs. v Wellington Assocs., 37 NY2d 273; Farmers Natl. Bank v Tulloch, supra). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 336, 716 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beal-bank-ssb-v-sandpiper-resort-corp-nyappdiv-2000.