Beacon Oil & Refining Co. v. State

56 S.W.2d 519
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 1933
DocketNo. 7915.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 56 S.W.2d 519 (Beacon Oil & Refining Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beacon Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 56 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

McClendon, c. j.

Appeal from an interlocutory order granting a temporary restraining and mandatory injunction in favor of the state against Beacon Oil & Refining Company (called herein the refining company) requiring the latter to file with the Railroad Commission certain' daily and semimonthly reports prescribed by the commission in what are designated as forms E-H and E-I in rules promulgated by the commission in performing its functions under the mineral oil proration laws.

The only question urged in the appeal is alleged error of the trial court in overruling a plea in abatement setting up the filing by the refining company of a bill in equity in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, at Tyler, wherein the commission was sought to be enjoined from enforcing the rules involved in the order appealed from.

Appeals from interlocutory orders are hot allowed except in the specific instances authorized by statute. Our statutes do not allow appeal from interlocutory orders granting or overruling pleas in abatement on the ground of another suit pending. Review of such orders can only be had in an appeal from a final judgment. The instant appeal is only from the interlocutory temporary injunctive order, and does not confer jurisdiction to review the order overruling the plea in abatement.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Order appealed from affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Speer v. Stover
711 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
City of Arlington v. Texas Electric Service Co.
540 S.W.2d 580 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Sizzler Family Steak Houses v. Nuss
444 S.W.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Matson
325 S.W.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Moser v. John F. Buckner & Sons
308 S.W.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Sherrill v. Brazos River Transmission Electric Cooperative, Inc.
263 S.W.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Hammonds v. Lloyds Fire & Cas. Assur. of San Antonio
256 S.W.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Horn v. Sankary
161 S.W.2d 156 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Adams v. Impey
131 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Prince v. Forman
119 S.W.2d 102 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.W.2d 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beacon-oil-refining-co-v-state-texapp-1933.