BEACHLAWN BUILDING CORP. v. City of St. Clair Shores

136 N.W.2d 926, 376 Mich. 261, 1965 Mich. LEXIS 219
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 1965
DocketCalendar No. 4, Docket No. 50,633
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 136 N.W.2d 926 (BEACHLAWN BUILDING CORP. v. City of St. Clair Shores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BEACHLAWN BUILDING CORP. v. City of St. Clair Shores, 136 N.W.2d 926, 376 Mich. 261, 1965 Mich. LEXIS 219 (Mich. 1965).

Opinion

Souris, J.

In Beachlawn Building Corporation v. City of St. Clair Shores (1963), 370 Mich 128, we reversed the trial judge’s grant of defendant’s motion for directed verdict made at the close of plaintiff’s proofs. In the process of reaching that decision our opinion stated the law of the case to be applied in the new trial ordered. The law of the ease, as we restated it soon thereafter in Theatre Control Corp. v. Detroit (1963), 370 Mich 382, 388, is that Beachlawn is entitled to maintain an action to recover fees paid by it for building permits under an ordinance which was held to be invalid in Merrelli v. City of St. Clair Shores (1959), 355 Mich 575. While the record before this Court in the 1963 Beachlawn Case contained evidence that Beachlawn had protested payment of some, if not all, of the fees exacted from it for building permits, such evidentiary proof was not essential to plaintiff’s assertion of a cause of action according to the rationale of our decision. The controlling issue in such cases, we said, is whether the payments made were voluntary or under compulsion or duress so as to be involuntary and not whether the payments were made under protest. Since plaintiff could not have proceeded safely to build houses without permits from defendant, required by valid ordinance antedating the amendments declared invalid in Merrelli, supra, we concluded that plaintiff’s payments were involuntary *263 because plaintiff had to pay what defendant demanded or give up its business. In support we cited Pingree v. Mutual Gas Co. (1895), 107 Mich 156; and City of Saginaw v. Consumers Power Co. (1943), 304 Mich 491, and other earlier decisions of this Court.

On the retrial, defendant offered evidence that plaintiff had not protested payment of the invalid building permit fees notwithstanding our opinion in the 1963 appeal in which we said that the fact of protest was not an essential element of plaintiff’s case. The trial judge correctly excluded proof of such evidence, plaintiff’s right to recover the amount paid even absent protest, because paid involuntarily, having been determined in the 1963 appeal.

Plaintiff, on the retrial, having proved the amount paid without contradiction by defendant, was entitled to the directed verdict and judgment in its favor.

All other questions raised by defendant in this appeal were considered and decided in Merrelli, supra.

Affirmed. Costs may he taxed in plaintiff’s favor.

T. M. Kavanagh, C. J., and Dethmers, Kelly, Smith, O’Hara, and Adams, JJ., concurred with Souris, J. Black, J., concurred in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CASTLE INV. CO. v. City of Detroit
680 N.W.2d 877 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2004)
Northview Construction Co. v. CITY OF ST CLAIR SHORES
249 N.W.2d 290 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1976)
Bond v. Ann Arbor School District
178 N.W.2d 484 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1970)
Northview Construction Co. v. City of St. Clair Shores
162 N.W.2d 297 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.W.2d 926, 376 Mich. 261, 1965 Mich. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beachlawn-building-corp-v-city-of-st-clair-shores-mich-1965.