Beacham v. City of Greenville

89 S.E. 401, 104 S.C. 421, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 158
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 30, 1916·No. 9414·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an action for injunction to restrain the city of Greenville from issuing bonds, to the amount of $40,000, for the mity hospital, which were voted at an election ordered for the purpose of deciding that question.

The appellant’s attorneys in their argument state that it is impossible for them to differentiate this case from that of Seegers v. Gibbes, 72 S. C. 532, 52 S. E. 586, and they freely admit that if the Court adheres to the ruling therein announced, the city has the right to exclude from the calculations the two disputed items. This Court does adhere to its ruling in that case, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated by his Honor, the presiding Judge*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beacham v. City of Greenville, 89 S.E. 401, 104 S.C. 421, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 158 (S.C. 1916).

89 S.E. 401 (Beacham v. City of Greenville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin v. McFadden
109 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Knight v. Allen
109 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)