Beacham v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Beacham v. City of Greenville

89 S.E. 401, 104 S.C. 421, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 158

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 30, 1916

Docket9414

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 401 (Beacham v. City of Greenville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beacham v. City of Greenville, 89 S.E. 401, 104 S.C. 421, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 158 (S.C. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an action for injunction to restrain the city of Greenville from issuing bonds, to the amount of $40,000, for the mity hospital, which were voted at an election ordered for the purpose of deciding that question.

The appellant’s attorneys in their argument state that it is impossible for them to differentiate this case from that of Seegers v. Gibbes, 72 S. C. 532, 52 S. E. 586, and they freely admit that if the Court adheres to the ruling therein announced, the city has the right to exclude from the calculations the two disputed items. This Court does adhere to its ruling in that case, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated by his Honor, the presiding Judge*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an action for injunction to restrain the city of Greenville from issuing bonds, to the amount of $40,000, for the mity hospital, which were voted at an election ordered for the purpose of deciding that question.

The appellant’s attorneys in their argument state that it is impossible for them to differentiate this case from that of Seegers v. Gibbes, 72 S. C. 532, 52 S. E. 586, and they freely admit that if the Court adheres to the ruling therein announced, the city has the right to exclude from the calculations the two disputed items. This Court does adhere to its ruling in that case, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated by his Honor, the presiding Judge*

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 401, 104 S.C. 421, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beacham-v-city-of-greenville-sc-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack