Beach v. Sweeney

Ohio Supreme Court

Beach v. Sweeney

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1958·No. No. 35193·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Beach v. Sweeney, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477 (Ohio 1958).

Pincite

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477 (Beach v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.