Beach v. Sweeney

Ohio Supreme Court

Beach v. Sweeney

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 23, 1958

DocketNo. 35193

StatusPublished

This text of 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477 (Beach v. Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beach v. Sweeney, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477 (Ohio 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-v-sweeney-ohio-1958.