Beach v. Mahar
263 A.D. 1069, 34 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order removes action No, 2 from Putnam county to Onondaga county and consolidates the two [1070]*1070actions in an action by a grantor to vacate a trust agreement and an action by a trustee for a construction of the trust agreement.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beach v. Mahar, 263 A.D. 1069, 34 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
263 A.D. 1069 (Beach v. Mahar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.