Beach v. Inman
78 F. 923, 24 C.C.A. 408, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1723
This text of 78 F. 923 (Beach v. Inman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beach v. Inman, 78 F. 923, 24 C.C.A. 408, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1723 (2d Cir. 1897).
Opinion
We agree with the judge who heard the motion in the circuit court that the grooved roller of defendant’s machine is substantially the upper clamping die of the patent, for the mechanical reasons set forth in the opinion below. That being so, defendant’s machine is an infringement, and the order of the circuit court (75 Fed. 840) is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
David Belais, Inc. v. Goldsmith Bros. Smelting & Refining Co.
6 F.2d 930 (S.D. New York, 1925)
Beach v. Hobbs
92 F. 146 (First Circuit, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
78 F. 923, 24 C.C.A. 408, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-v-inman-ca2-1897.