Beach v. Fulton Bank
7 Cow. 485
Opinion
It is very properly conceded that here are only two questions; 1. Whether the defendants could be guilty of a conversion of these goods, as a corporation, in any way; and 2. Whether trover will lie against a corporation aggregate. We cannot bring ourselves to doubt on either question; and this motion is therefore denied.
Motion denied
See N. Y. Dig. vol. 4, tit. Trover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beach v. Fulton Bank, 7 Cow. 485 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
7 Cow. 485 (Beach v. Fulton Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fishkill Savings Institution v. National Bank
80 N.Y. 162 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Fournier v. Cyr
64 Me. 32 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1874)
McCracken v. City of San Francisco
16 Cal. 591 (California Supreme Court, 1860)