Beach v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.

167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 618
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 415 (Beach v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beach v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co., 167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 618 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review a final decree of foreclosure in a case wherein the defense of usury was interposed.

After careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we find that the disposition of the case depends upon the determination of the single question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and decree of the Chancellor based on such findings.

We find ample substantial legal evidence to support the findings and decree and, therefore, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-v-florida-bond-mortgage-co-fla-1936.