Beach v. City of Chicago

186 Ill. 208
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 21, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 186 Ill. 208 (Beach v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beach v. City of Chicago, 186 Ill. 208 (Ill. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Elli A. Beach and others, plaintiffs in error, complain that the county court of Cook county erred in confirming a special assessment upon their lots for putting in a combined curb and gutter on Drexel avenue and certain other streets in Chicago; that the ordinance was invalid because it did not sufficiently describe the combined curb and gutter. The ordinance was insufficient in substantially -the same respects as the one involved in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, which was held invalid.

The judgment of confirmation is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holden v. City of Chicago
50 N.E. 181 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 Ill. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1900.