Bea v. Arthur

Fourth Circuit

Bea v. Arthur

118 F. App'x 736

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2004·No. No. 04-7451·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marion Leon Bea appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bea v. Arthur, No. CA-04-802 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 23, 2004 & entered Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [737]*737the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marion Leon Bea appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bea v. Arthur, No. CA-04-802 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 23, 2004 & entered Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [737]*737the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bea v. Arthur, 118 F. App'x 736 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

118 F. App'x 736 (Bea v. Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related