B.D. v. Department of Children & Families

46 So. 3d 650, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546, 2010 WL 4257670
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2010·No. No. 5D10-1536·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment terminating appellant’s parental rights, rendered after the entry of a consent by default. Constructive consent should be the disfavored result in a termination of parental rights proceeding. A.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 22 So.3d 801 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). The trial court should have either granted a short continuance or permitted appellant to appear by telephone where the record reflects that appellant was making a reasonable effort to personally appear at the scheduled adjudicatory hearing. D.M. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 921 So.2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also B.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 882 So.2d 1099, 1100-01 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Courts have made a distinction between parents who fail to appear at a hearing without a reasonable explanation versus those who have made some reasonable effort to be present.”)

REVERSED and REMANDED for New Adjudicatory Hearing.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.D. v. Department of Children & Families, 46 So. 3d 650, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546, 2010 WL 4257670 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

46 So. 3d 650 (B.D. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.W.M. v. Department of Children & Families
184 So. 3d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
R.W.M. v. Dep't of Children & Families
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015