B.D. Nelson Land Development, Inc. v. Jackson

663 So. 2d 932, 1995 WL 341768
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 9, 1995·No. 1931442·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

RICHARD L. JONES, Retired Justice.

After a nonjury trial, the court awarded the plaintiff, Bernadette Jackson, equitable relief and monetary damages. The defendant appealed. Because the trial record shows substantial evidence in support of the equitable relief, we hold, pursuant to the ore terms rule of appellate review, that that portion of the judgment is due to be affirmed.

Because the record contains no evidence to support the monetary award, that portion of the judgment is due to be reversed, with a judgment rendered for the defendant on the plaintiffs claim for monetary damages.

This opinion was prepared by retired Justice Richard L. Jones, sitting as a Justice of this Court pursuant to § 12-18-10(e), Ala. Code 1975.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND JUDGMENT RENDERED.

SHORES, HOUSTON, INGRAM, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. MADDOX, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.D. Nelson Land Development, Inc. v. Jackson, 663 So. 2d 932, 1995 WL 341768 (Ala. 1995).

663 So. 2d 932 (B.D. Nelson Land Development, Inc. v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Hoof v. Van Hoof
997 So. 2d 278 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)