B.C.M. v. State

838 So. 2d 664, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2472, 2003 WL 717458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2725·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

B.C.M. appeals an order revoking probation, adjudicating him delinquent and imposing high-risk commitment and probation for the offense of first-degree misdemeanor petit theft. B.C.M. contends that because he had already served one year of commitment, which is equivalent to the maximum sentence for petit theft, his probationary term had expired; therefore, the trial court did not have jurisdiction over such offense, and the state agrees, conceding error. See § 985.231(l)(a)(l)(a) & (l)(d), Fla. Stat. (1999); N.P.L. v. State, 819 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); T.M.B. v. State, 689 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved on other grounds, 716 So.2d 269 (Fla.1998).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.

ERVIN, WOLF and Van NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.C.M. v. State, 838 So. 2d 664, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2472, 2003 WL 717458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

838 So. 2d 664 (B.C.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.L.S. v. State
912 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)