B.C. v. State

59 So. 3d 321, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628, 2011 WL 1485986
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 2011
DocketNo. 3D09-2902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 So. 3d 321 (B.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.C. v. State, 59 So. 3d 321, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628, 2011 WL 1485986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

The adjudication below for possession of marijuana'is affirmed. We conclude that the disputed search of B.C.’s person which revealed the contraband was properly conducted incident to arrest based upon probable cause that, as a passenger in a vehicle which was the site of a drug transaction observed by a fellow officer, B.C. had committed a felony offense. See Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366, 124 S.Ct. 795, 157 L.Ed.2d 769 (2003); see also Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323, 129 S.Ct. 781, 172 L.Ed.2d 694 (2009); see also State v. Bagley, 844 So.2d 688, 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“The fellow officer rule allows an arresting officer to assume probable cause to arrest a suspect from information supplied [322]*322by other officers.” (quoting Voorhees v. State, 699 So.2d 602, 609 (Fla.1997))).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
76 So. 3d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 3d 321, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628, 2011 WL 1485986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bc-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.