B.C. v. C.P. & D.B., Pets
This text of B.C. v. C.P. & D.B., Pets (B.C. v. C.P. & D.B., Pets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
B.C., : No. 61 WAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : C.P. AND D.B., : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the lower courts erred in placing paramount importance on periods of separation in determining that the presumption of paternity was inapplicable, despite the marital couple’s reconciliation which predated the third-party’s paternity action?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
B.C. v. C.P. & D.B., Pets, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bc-v-cp-db-pets-pa-2023.