BB&T v. Peacock Farm, Inc.
This text of BB&T v. Peacock Farm, Inc. (BB&T v. Peacock Farm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 230A15
Filed 18 December 2015
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
v.
PEACOCK FARM, INC., RODOLPHE T. LYNCH, and WILLARD A. RHODES
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 772 S.E.2d 495 (2015), dismissing an
interlocutory appeal from an order entered on 5 June 2012, as certified under Rule of
Civil Procedure 54(b) by an order entered on 16 April 2014, both by Judge Anderson
D. Cromer in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17
November 2015.
Howard, Stallings, From, Hutson, Atkins, Angell & Davis, P.A., by John N. Hutson, Jr. and Matthew M. Lawless, for plaintiff-appellee.
Van Camp, Meacham & Newman, PLLC, by William M. Van O’Linda, Jr., for defendant-appellant Rodolphe T. Lynch.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, the decision of the Court of
Appeals is affirmed. We remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further remand
to the trial court so that additional proceedings may be held not inconsistent with the
opinion.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BB&T v. Peacock Farm, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bbt-v-peacock-farm-inc-nc-2015.