BBMB, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

BBMB, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security

506 S.W.3d 412, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2017 WL 83520

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 2017

DocketWD 79638

StatusPublished

This text of 506 S.W.3d 412 (BBMB, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BBMB, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security, 506 S.W.3d 412, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2017 WL 83520 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

BBMB, Inc. appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission determining that several workers performed services for wages in employment by BBMB within the meaning of those terms in sections 288.034, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and 288.036, RSMo Non-cum. Supp. 2015. BBMB contends that the Commission’s decision was not supported by the facts found by the Commission and/or there was no sufficient, competent evidence in the record to warrant the decision. It claims that the overwhelming weight of the evidence in the record indicated that the workers were independent contractors under the factors of the common law right to control test. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been [413]*413provided to the parties. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

BBMB, Inc. appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission determining that several workers performed services for wages in employment by BBMB within the meaning of those terms in sections 288.034, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and 288.036, RSMo Non-cum. Supp. 2015. BBMB contends that the Commission’s decision was not supported by the facts found by the Commission and/or there was no sufficient, competent evidence in the record to warrant the decision. It claims that the overwhelming weight of the evidence in the record indicated that the workers were independent contractors under the factors of the common law right to control test. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been [413]*413provided to the parties. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 S.W.3d 412, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2017 WL 83520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bbmb-inc-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2017.