BBCN Bank v. 12th Avenue Restaurant Group, Inc.

2016 NY Slip Op 7593, 144 A.D.3d 494, 41 N.Y.S.3d 226
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2016
Docket2195N 159880/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7593 (BBCN Bank v. 12th Avenue Restaurant Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BBCN Bank v. 12th Avenue Restaurant Group, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 7593, 144 A.D.3d 494, 41 N.Y.S.3d 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

*495 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered November 5, 2015, which granted defendants 12th Avenue Restaurant Group, Inc., doing business as Hudson River Café, and Rafael Cepeda’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

To vacate the default judgment, defendants were required to show a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see John Harris P.C. v Krauss, 87 AD3d 469 [1st Dept 2011]). The court abused its discretion in finding that defendants made these showings. With regard to reasonable excuse, defendants relied on law office failure. However, they failed to show that they even retained counsel for this, as opposed to another action. Further, while counsel passed away some two years into the case (or to take defendants’ view, six months after he was retained) from a “long illness,” defendants offered no evidence at all as to when counsel took ill or how and when that illness affected his ability to put in an answer. This speculation is insufficient to establish law office failure (see Herhstein v Herhstein, 44 AD3d 311 [1st Dept 2007]).

Defendants failed to establish a meritorious defense. Their claim that Cepeda never knew of the debt to plaintiff is belied by the asset purchase agreement which Cepeda signed and in which 12th Avenue acquired all of HRC’s assets, and pursuant to which one half of the purchase price ($225,000) was to be conveyed by the assumption by 12th Avenue of the debt owed to plaintiff.

Concur—Renwick, J.R, Moskowitz, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Harris P.C. v. Krauss
87 A.D.3d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 7593, 144 A.D.3d 494, 41 N.Y.S.3d 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bbcn-bank-v-12th-avenue-restaurant-group-inc-nyappdiv-2016.