Bazzill 349826 v. McGrane
This text of Bazzill 349826 v. McGrane (Bazzill 349826 v. McGrane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ryan Eugene Bazzill, No. CV-25-08022-PCT-KML (MTM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 Vv. Dennis McGrane, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On March 18, 2025, the court ruled the complaint in this case was duplicative of a 16 || complaint plaintiff filed in CV-24-8165. (Doc. 6 at 4.) This case was dismissed on that 17 || basis. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, but that motion does not address the basis for the court’s dismissal. (Doc. 8.) Reconsideration is not merited. See Zimmerman v. City 19 || of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2001) (discussing factors for granting a motion for 90 || reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)). Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 23 Dated this 27th day of March, 2025. 24 CU da MA 07 United States District Judge 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bazzill 349826 v. McGrane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazzill-349826-v-mcgrane-azd-2025.