Bazilio v. United States
This text of Bazilio v. United States (Bazilio v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7209
TROY NOLAN BAZILIO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:93-cr-00041-F-1; 5:97-cv-00032-F)
Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 21, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Nolan Bazilio, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Troy Nolan Bazilio appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) action and
to stay the appeal pending the court’s ruling on the motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bazilio v. United States, Nos. 5:93-cr-00041-F-1; 5:97-cv-
00032-F (E.D.N.C. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bazilio v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazilio-v-united-states-ca4-2008.