Bazile v. City of New York

40 F. App'x 622
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bazile v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 F. App'x 805
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 8, 2002·No. Dockeet No. 01-7879·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Okhela Bazile appeals the dismissal by the Southern District of New York (Pres-ka, J.) of her § 1983 damages suit, which alleged (inter alia) false arrest. Bazile initially sued the city, the police department, and various officers. However, she later withdrew her claims against all but the arresting officer. The district court held that because the arrest for trespass was “at least arguably reasonable,” the arresting officer was entitled to qualified immunity. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bazile v. City of New York, et al, 00 Civ. 4727(LAP) (S.D.N.Y. June 18, 2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bazile v. City of New York, 40 F. App'x 622 (2d Cir. 2002).

40 F. App'x 622 (Bazile v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.