Bazile v. City of New York
This text of 40 F. App'x 622 (Bazile v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.
Okhela Bazile appeals the dismissal by the Southern District of New York (Pres-ka, J.) of her § 1983 damages suit, which alleged (inter alia) false arrest. Bazile initially sued the city, the police department, and various officers. However, she later withdrew her claims against all but the arresting officer. The district court held that because the arrest for trespass was “at least arguably reasonable,” the arresting officer was entitled to qualified immunity. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bazile v. City of New York, et al, 00 Civ. 4727(LAP) (S.D.N.Y. June 18, 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 F. App'x 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazile-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-2002.