Bazemore v. United States

Supreme Court

Bazemore v. United States

179 L. Ed. 2d 1185, 131 S. Ct. 2889, 563 U.S. 972, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3494, 79 U.S.L.W. 3628

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 2, 2011

DocketNo. 10-9807

StatusPublished

This text of 179 L. Ed. 2d 1185 (Bazemore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bazemore v. United States, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1185, 131 S. Ct. 2889, 563 U.S. 972, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3494, 79 U.S.L.W. 3628 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 L. Ed. 2d 1185, 131 S. Ct. 2889, 563 U.S. 972, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3494, 79 U.S.L.W. 3628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazemore-v-united-states-scotus-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack