Bazemore v. Koehler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bazemore v. Koehler

169 A.D.2d 574, 564 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D.2d 574 (Bazemore v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bazemore v. Koehler, 169 A.D.2d 574, 564 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leonard Cohen, J.), entered on November 28, 1989, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul a determination of respondent Correction Commissioner, dismissing petitioner from his position as a probationary correction officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On June 6, 1989, petitioner, a probationary correction officer, while off duty, shot and killed a person who allegedly [575]*575attempted to stab an acquaintance of the petitioner. The officer failed to immediately report the incident, but voluntarily turned himself in two days later. Both the officer and his acquaintance were indicted for murder. On June 27, 1989, petitioner was dismissed as a correction officer, the termination retroactive to June 8, 1989, the date he surrendered to the police.

Petitioner argues his termination was arbitrary and capricious, and that he is entitled to a "name-clearing” hearing. We do not agree. A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing or statement of reasons as long as the discharge was in good faith and without a constitutionally impermissible motive. (Matter of Montero v Lum, 68 NY2d 253.) Further, as petitioner was dismissed without any stated reason, no defamatory impression was created, and he is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing. Concur—Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leonard Cohen, J.), entered on November 28, 1989, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul a determination of respondent Correction Commissioner, dismissing petitioner from his position as a probationary correction officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On June 6, 1989, petitioner, a probationary correction officer, while off duty, shot and killed a person who allegedly [575]*575attempted to stab an acquaintance of the petitioner. The officer failed to immediately report the incident, but voluntarily turned himself in two days later. Both the officer and his acquaintance were indicted for murder. On June 27, 1989, petitioner was dismissed as a correction officer, the termination retroactive to June 8, 1989, the date he surrendered to the police.

Petitioner argues his termination was arbitrary and capricious, and that he is entitled to a "name-clearing” hearing. We do not agree. A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing or statement of reasons as long as the discharge was in good faith and without a constitutionally impermissible motive. (Matter of Montero v Lum, 68 NY2d 253.) Further, as petitioner was dismissed without any stated reason, no defamatory impression was created, and he is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing. Concur—Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 574, 564 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazemore-v-koehler-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack