Bazemore v. Emran

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2004
Docket04-6017
StatusUnpublished

This text of Bazemore v. Emran (Bazemore v. Emran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bazemore v. Emran, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6017

RAY SHANDELL BAZEMORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR EMRAN; MRS. WEBB; MRS. STANFORD; PAGE TRUE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-704-AM)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Shandell Bazemore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ray Shandell Bazemore appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Bazemore v. Emran, No. CA-03-704-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bazemore v. Emran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazemore-v-emran-ca4-2004.