Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 9, 1990

DocketNo. 087212

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696 (Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990), 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM IN RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATED JANUARY 3, 1990 Whether Henry Borkowski, M.D., the defendant, is a principal employer within the meaning of 31-241 presents at best in this litigation a question of degree and fact for the trier. Grenier v. Grenier, 138 Conn. 569, 571 (1952); King v. Palmer, 129 Conn. 636,639 (1943); Borgatt v. Pratt Whitney Aircraft Co.,114 Conn. 126, 135-39 (1932).

We do not think that either our case law or the parties' affidavits filed in connection with this motion support our concluding, as a matter of law, that in these circumstances Doctor Borkowski is a principal employer. The motion for summary judgment is denied.

So ordered. WILLIAM PATRICK MURRAY A JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CT Page 2697

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM IN RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATED JANUARY 3, 1990 Whether Henry Borkowski, M.D., the defendant, is a principal employer within the meaning of 31-241 presents at best in this litigation a question of degree and fact for the trier. Grenier v. Grenier, 138 Conn. 569, 571 (1952); King v. Palmer, 129 Conn. 636,639 (1943); Borgatt v. Pratt Whitney Aircraft Co.,114 Conn. 126, 135-39 (1932).

We do not think that either our case law or the parties' affidavits filed in connection with this motion support our concluding, as a matter of law, that in these circumstances Doctor Borkowski is a principal employer. The motion for summary judgment is denied.

So ordered. WILLIAM PATRICK MURRAY A JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CT Page 2697

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baywood-v-borkowski-no-087212-oct-9-1990-connsuperct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack