Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 9, 1990·No. No. 087212·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM IN RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATED JANUARY 3, 1990 Whether Henry Borkowski, M.D., the defendant, is a principal employer within the meaning of 31-241 presents at best in this litigation a question of degree and fact for the trier. Grenier v. Grenier, 138 Conn. 569, 571 (1952); King v. Palmer, 129 Conn. 636,639 (1943); Borgatt v. Pratt Whitney Aircraft Co.,114 Conn. 126, 135-39 (1932).

We do not think that either our case law or the parties' affidavits filed in connection with this motion support our concluding, as a matter of law, that in these circumstances Doctor Borkowski is a principal employer. The motion for summary judgment is denied.

So ordered. WILLIAM PATRICK MURRAY A JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CT Page 2697

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990), 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2696 (Baywood v. Borkowski, No. 087212 (Oct. 9, 1990)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grenier v. Grenier
87 A.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1952)
Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.
157 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1932)
King v. Palmer
30 A.2d 549 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1943)