Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 2959, 149 A.D.3d 891, 50 N.Y.S.3d 308
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 2017
Docket2015-00422
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2959 (Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 2959, 149 A.D.3d 891, 50 N.Y.S.3d 308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Gerald Williams appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Livote, J.), entered November 18, 2014, which, upon his default in answering the complaint, and upon two orders of the same court (J. Golia, J.), dated May 18, 2012, and February 13, 2013, respectively, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion to confirm a referee’s report and directed the sale of the subject property.

Ordered that the order and judgment entered November 18, 2014, is affirmed, with costs.

In an order dated February 13, 2013, the Supreme Court determined that the defendant Gerald Williams (hereinafter the defendant) waived the defense of lack of standing. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 5, 2015, the defendant’s appeal from that order was dismissed for fail *892 ure to perfect. The defendant now seeks to raise the issue of lack of standing on the present appeal from the order and judgment. As a general rule, this Court does not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised on an earlier appeal which was dismissed for failure to perfect, although this Court has the inherent jurisdiction to do so (see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750, 754 [1999]; Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350, 353 [1976]). We decline to exercise that jurisdiction in this case.

The defendant’s remaining contention is improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Entwistle
2025 NY Slip Op 04863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Bonilla
2024 NY Slip Op 04242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Morton
2024 NY Slip Op 01802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 5200 Enters. Ltd.
195 N.Y.S.3d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Pennymac Corp. v. Pryce
211 A.D.3d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Licurse
180 N.Y.S.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Plaut
206 A.D.3d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Ballan v. Sirota
2018 NY Slip Op 5014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2959, 149 A.D.3d 891, 50 N.Y.S.3d 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayview-loan-servicing-llc-v-williams-nyappdiv-2017.