Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. Wicker

178 A.3d 1289

• Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: January 17, 2018
• Docket: 310 WAL 2017 (Granted)
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for-Allowance of Appeal is .GRANTED, 'LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the decision of the trial court which found the [Respondent’s] witness competent to testify and received evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule?

(2) As to the contested evidence received by the Court, will a grant of allocatur, here, resolve the conflict between both U.S. Bank v. Pauten-is; Boyle v. Steiman and Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Smith as to the admissibility of witness testimony at a debt collection trial?