Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Jacobsen
This text of Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Jacobsen (Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Jacobsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
- ---STATE OFNrAINE___ ·-·-----SUPER10RCUURT___ YORK, SS. DOCKET NO. RE-12-152
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
MARK C. JACOBSEN, in his capacity as co-personal representative of the EST ATE of CRAIG L. JACOBSEN, et al.,
Defendants.
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed this foreclosure action after a mortgage
granted to Craig L. Jacobsen went into default following his death. Bayview Loan
Servicing, LLC ("Bayview"), has since acquired the loan from J.P. Morgan Chase and
has been substituted as Plaintiff The mortgage, dated October 14, 2005, was originally
granted to Washington Mutual Bank, F .A. and recorded at the York County Registry of
Deeds at Book 14649, Pages 863-882. Mark and Heidi Jacobsen, co-personal
representatives of Craig Jacobsen's estate, have been substituted as Defendants.
A hearing was held on March 19, 2015. A representative from Bayview, Terrence
Schonleber, testified. Mark Jacobsen also testified. The Defendants objected to the
admission of several exhibits. Exhibits 4 and 5 are two copies of the same notice of
default that were purportedly mailed to different addresses and Exhibit 6 is a system
print-out with the payoff amount due on the loan. The court accepted the exhibits
1 u n--Conditionaiiy,-tooK tlie-ri:iaffer- under advrsement, anainstructeCflliepartres- to--suom1f--
briefs on the admissibility of each exhibit.
At the hearing, Mr. Schonleber testified about the recordkeeping and business
practices at Bayview. The court finds Mr. Schonleber credibly testified that he was
familiar with Bayview's recordkeeping and business practices and the processing system
known as "MSP," which Bayview utilizes to track loan data and generate payoff printouts
like those depicted in Exhibit 6. He testified he was generally aware that MSP was also
utilized by the prior loan servicer, J.P. Morgan Chase. He was unable, however, to testify
from personal knowledge as to the actual recordkeeping practices at J.P. Morgan Chase
beyond the fact the business also uses the MSP processing system. Mr. Schonleber
conceded that the accuracy of the records kept and maintained by Bayview would depend
on the accuracy of J.P. Morgan Chase's records, and he had no personal knowledge of
how the records were kept and whether they were accurate. Because Mr. Schonleber
could only speculate as to how J.P. Morgan Chase kept the records and whether they
were accurate, he was not a custodian or qualified witness who can establish the
reliability or trustworthiness and thus admissibility of Exhibit 6. See Bank of Am., NA. v.
Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ~~ 26-27, 96 A.3d 700; Beneficial Me. Inc. v. Carter, 2011 ME
77, ~,-r 13-14, 25 A.3d 96.
As to Exhibits 4 and 5, the notice standards set forth in 14 M.R.S. § 6111 require
the mortgagor occupy the property as a primary residence. The statute does not apply in
this case because the default arose only after Craig Jacobsen was deceased and thus no
longer occupied the premises. The notice provisions set forth in the mortgage contract,
however, remain in force notwithstanding the mortgagor's death. (Ex. 2 ,-r 15.) Exhibits 4
2 establish notice was provided. Deficient notice is therefore a second, independent ground
that precludes judgment for Plaintiff. See Camden Nat 'l Bank v. Peterson, 2008 :rv1E 158,
,-r 11, 957 A.2d 591 (holding notice requirements set forth in mortgage contract applied
independently of 14 M.R.S. § 6111).
The clerk will make the following entry, by reference, on the docket pursuant to Rule 79(a):
Judgment for the Defendant.
SO ORDERED.
DATE: May Jj_, 2015
John O'Neil, Jr. Justice, Superior Court
3 RE-12-152
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: ELIZABETH .M YOUNG LEONARD F MORLEY WILLIAM B JORDAN SHAPIRO & MORLEY LLP] 707 SABLE OAKS DRIVE STE 250 SOUTHPORTLANDME 04106
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT: MARK JACOBSEN CO-PR THOMAS COX POBOX 1314 PORTLAND ME 04104
HEIDI JACOBSEN CO-PR PRO SE HEIDI JACOBSEN, CO-PR 259 CAT MOUSAM ROAD KENNEBUNK ME 04043
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Jacobsen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayview-loan-servicing-llc-v-jacobsen-mesuperct-2015.