Bayshore Sew. Co. v. DEPT. OF ENVTL. PROTEC.

328 A.2d 246, 131 N.J. Super. 37
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedNovember 7, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 328 A.2d 246 (Bayshore Sew. Co. v. DEPT. OF ENVTL. PROTEC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayshore Sew. Co. v. DEPT. OF ENVTL. PROTEC., 328 A.2d 246, 131 N.J. Super. 37 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

131 N.J. Super. 37 (1974)
328 A.2d 246

BAYSHORE SEWERAGE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, HAZLET TOWNSHIP SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY AND BAYSHORE REGIONAL SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 22, 1974.
Decided November 7, 1974.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, LYNCH and ALLCORN.

Mr. William R. Holzapfel argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Francis R. Perkins, on the brief).

Mr. Morton J. Goldfein, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents Department of Environmental Protection of the State of New Jersey and State of New Jersey (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., former Attorney General of New Jersey; Mr. Joseph M. Clayton, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. John E. Holobinko argued the cause for respondents Township of Hazlet and Hazlet Township Sewerage Authority (Messrs. Roberts, Madden & Holobinko, attorneys).

Mr. Clark C. Vogel argued the cause for respondent Bayshore Regional Sewerage Authority (Messrs. Stout, O'Hagan & Hertz, attorneys).

*38 PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge McGowan which is reported at 122 N.J. Super. 184 (Ch. Div. 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 A.2d 246, 131 N.J. Super. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayshore-sew-co-v-dept-of-envtl-protec-njsuperctappdiv-1974.